This site is directed at Institutional/Professional Investors only. It is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice nor a recommendation to buy/sell any products nor as an offer or solicitation to engage in any investment activity.

Insights & News / Markets

SparkChange Carbon Market Monthly Report (April 2024)

Philipp Ruf
Philipp Ruf

Data & Analytics

April Developments:

  • European Carbon built on March’s bounce to return a price rise of c11% in April, leaving the EUA price up c32% from the February lows. The month’s price development continued to be jittery, with an intra-month rally of c28% from trough to peak, despite EUA fundamentals remaining sluggish throughout the month.
  • Ember Climate* confirmed a continuation of the power sector emissions trends seen in recent months: less than a quarter of the EU’s electricity demand was met by thermal means in April, for the first time ever, with coal-fired generation at an all-time low of c9%, while renewables generated 54% of the bloc’s needs. On top, EUA supply remains inflated by REPowerEU and the inclusion of maritime.
  • That said, rising geopolitical risks at a time when sentiment and investor positioning were both acutely negative were more than enough to offset that bearish backdrop. In particular, the escalation of tensions between Israel and Iran mid-April was a key trigger of upside in both gas and EUA prices, as the market digested the risk of global LNG disruption in the event of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Whilst the retaliatory cycle between Israel and Iran seems to have found a pause, investors have been unwilling to retake bearish bets in Carbon. In fact, we’ve seen the opposite, with the net short position held by Investment Funds ending April at c18mt, less than half of the February peak.

Outlook:

  • As we argued in our recent webinar, we are rapidly approaching an inflection point in EUA supply, where the EU ETS flips from small surplus in 2024 to material deficit in 2026 – 2030. We believe the current volatility in EUA prices – aside from that element driven by geopolitical news flow – is being exacerbated by the tug-of-war between shorter-term focused bears and longer-term focused bulls.
  • Heading into the summer months, where the EU ETS is most sensitive to extreme weather events, it remains to be seen whether Investment Funds will be willing to rebuild their short positions or continue trimming. If that potential buying demand is twinned with increased hedging demand by corporates, at a time when the compliance deadline (now September) looms, then it is possible we’ve already passed the EUA price inflection. In our post-webinar survey, 37% of respondents believed that to be the case, whilst 49% saw the inflection point later in 2024, and just 14% beyond.

Events to Watch:

  • 1st June – Publication of the annual surplus indicator (TNAC), and the impact on the Market Stability Reserve.

Please complete the form below to request the full PDF.

 

    * Ember Climate, a Climate & Energy think tank
    * Commitment of Traders report published by the
    Intercontinental Exchange

     

    DISCLAIMERS

    This communication has been provided to you for informational purposes only.

    This communication is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, financial promotion, investment recommendations or investment research.

    This communication is not intended as and is not to be taken as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or interest, nor does it constitute an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction, including those in which such an offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such a solicitation or offer. Distribution of information contained in this communication may be restricted by law. Persons receiving this communication should inform themselves about and observe any such restrictions. Any dissemination or other unauthorised use of this information or documents by any person or entity is strictly prohibited.

    SparkChange believes the information in this communication to be correct at the date of issue. However, no representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy of any of the information provided. Some information in this communication is based on information given/obtained from independent research providers that SparkChange considers to be reliable. Analysis provided in this communication may be based on subjective assessments and assumptions and can use one among several alternative methodologies that produce diverse results. Hence, analysis and projections should not be seen as factual and should not be relied upon as accurate predictions of future performance.